The Development of Telemedicine for Caring Patient undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis: Lesson Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Daravan Rongmuang Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Suratthani, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute
  • Intira Sukrungreung Buddhasothorn Hospital
  • Saraporn Mattayart Buddhasothorn Hospital
  • Patpong Udompat Phrapokklao Hospital
  • Atiya Sarakshetrin Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute
  • Suthanan Kunlaka Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute
  • Pheeradetch Samroumram Udonthani Municipality Hospital
  • Benjaporn Rajataram Praboromarajchanok Institute
  • Anant Kanoksilp Information and Communication Technology Center, Office of the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Public Health

Keywords:

telemedicine, patient undergoing peritoneal dialysis, medical care, COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Background and rationale: Chronic kidney patients with renal replacement therapy were at risk of COVID-19. During COVID-19 pandemic with social distancing practices, hospitals postponed patient’s appointments. Methodology: The purpose of this mixed-method study was to develop and examine the effectiveness of telemedicine model in caring for peritoneal dialysis patients from lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. The samples included 2 nephrologists, 6 pharmacists, 10 peritoneal dialysis nurses, and 80 peritoneal dialysis patients. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants. The study comprised 3 phases: phase 1 situation analysis; phase 2 design and development of a model of telemedicine service for peritoneal dialysis patients; and phase 3 result study of the telemedicine model by comparing the treatment time, cost and satisfaction. The research instruments covered a semi-structured interview guide, feasibility questionnaire of telemedicine model, cost record form, and satisfaction questionnaires for multidisciplinary team and peritoneal patients and caregivers. The quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and paired t-test. Results: 1. During COVID-19 pandemic, patients and their caregivers have difficulty getting to the hospital as scheduled, the continuity of taking medication and the limitation of home visits. Patients and multidisciplinary teams suggested that during COVID-19, the methods of care should be adjusted, using telephone online platforms, such as Line application, to provide patients and caregivers the knowledge to promote self-care. The applications should be downloaded onto a mobile phone for immediate communication with the doctor and nurse when abnormal symptoms and problems were found. 2. According to patients and care providers, the feasibility of a telemedicine model in caring for peritoneal dialysis patients was moderate at the beginning. The model was rated highly by the multidisciplinary team, patients, and caregivers at the conclusion of the intervention. 3. Three patterns of patient journeys of peritoneal dialysis patients were identified based on clinical status of the patients: a well-controlled, a moderate control, and an uncontrolled symptom group. and 4. medication management of erythropoietin (EPO) and other medications for chronic kidney disease and co-morbidities were delivered through a nearby client hospital network. Discussion and conclusion: The cost of telemedicine model incurred higher capital costs at periphery. The higher number of services should lower the unit costs. Telemedicine was proved to be a feasible model of providing care among patients who had good disease progression control and reducing hospital visits. Therefore, the health service may develop and expand the results of this study to other chronic diseases. The provider should combine telemedicine with outpatient service.

References

Valeri AM, Robbins-Juarez SY, Stevens JS, Ahn W, Rao MK, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Presentation and outcomes of patients with ESKD and COVID-19. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31:1409–15.

Halle MP, Hertig A, Kengne AP, Ashuntantang G, Rondeau E, Ridel C. Acute pulmonary edema in chronic dialysis patients admitted into an intensive care unit. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(2): 603-7.

Wilkie M, Davies S. Peritoneal dialysis in the time of COVID-19. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(4):357-8.

Wootton R. Proceedings of Tele Med 2001; London, 15–16 January 2001. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7(1suppl):1-6.

Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(11):736-71.

World Health Organization. Traveling during the coronavirus 19 outbreak [internet]. [cited 2021 Sep 21]. Available from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/searo/thailand/who-covid19-th-a4-r01s-web.pdf?sfvrsn=c8b80a30_0.

Intahphuak S, Tipwareerom W. Home visit: community nurses in Thailand 4.0 era. Journal of Nursing Science & Health. 2019;42(4):140-8. (in Thai)

Lew SQ. Telehealth in peritoneal dialysis: review of patient management. Adv Perit Dial. 2018;34:32-7.

Rattanapan P, Phetcharun P, Suriya S. Development of mail-order pharmacy system for hypertensive patient era of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Chiangrai Med J. 2020;12(2):48-66. (in Thai)

Richardson DR, Fry RL, Krasnow M. Cost-savings analysis of telemedicine use for ophthalmic screening in a rural. W V Med J. 2013;109(4):52-5.

Agha Z, Schapira RM, Maker AH. Cost effectiveness of tele- medicine for the delivery of outpatient pulmonary care to a rural population. Telemed J E Health. 2004;8(3):281-91.

Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programme. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

Russo JE, McCool RR, Davies L. VA telemedicine: an analysis of cost and time savings. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(3):209-15.

Gallar P, Gutiérrez M, Ortega O, Rodríguez I, Oliet A, Herrero JC, et al. Telemedicine and follow up of peritoneal dialysis patients. Nefrologia. 2006;26(3):365-71.

Ananthakrishnan AN, Singh S. The doctor will call you now! telemedicine in the midst of a pandemic. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(8):1688-90.

Bunjongpak S. Guideline for Thai physician’s work time regulation. Region 4-5 Medical Journal. 2016;35(1):28-34. (in Thai)

Bratton RL. Patient and physician satisfaction with telemedicine for monitoring vital signs. J Telemed Telecare. 2001;7(Suppl.1):72-3.

Kirby DJ, Fried JW, Buchalter DB, Moses MJ, Hurly ET, Cardone DA, et al. Patient and physician satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: sports medicine perspective. Telemed J E Health. 2020; ahead of print. [cited 2021 Sep 21]. Available from http://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0387.

Magnus M, Sikka N, Cherian T, Lew SQ. Satisfaction and improvements in peritoneal dialysis outcomes associated with telehealth. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8(1):214-25.

Sheena B, Craig L, Nayan P, Ram H. Implementation and patient satisfaction of telemedicine in spine physical medicine and rehabilitation patients during the COVID-19 shutdown. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(12):1079-85.

Downloads

Published

29-03-2023

How to Cite

1.
Rongmuang D, Sukrungreung I, Mattayart S, Udompat P, Sarakshetrin A, Kunlaka S, Samroumram P, Rajataram B, Kanoksilp A. The Development of Telemedicine for Caring Patient undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis: Lesson Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Health Syst Res [internet]. 2023 Mar. 29 [cited 2025 Sep. 12];17(1):108-27. available from: https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/j_hsr/article/view/3214

Issue

Section

original article