Social Return on Investment of Long-Term Care for Dependent Older Persons: A Case Study of Sa-Ard Subdistrict, Namphong, Khon Kaen

Authors

  • Surasak Chaiyasong Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University; Master of Pharmacy Program in Primary Care Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University
  • Nuanchan Sankong Master of Pharmacy Program in Primary Care Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University; Department of Pharmacy, Namphong Hospital, Khon Kaen
  • Kritsanee Saramunee Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University; Master of Pharmacy Program in Primary Care Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University
  • Romtawan Kalapat Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University
  • Khuandao Malasai Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University
  • Noppawan Yutipan Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University
  • Piyarak Rattanapakorn Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University
  • Manasate Phuworakij Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University

Keywords:

social return on investment, dependent elderly, long-term care, family care team, caregivers

Abstract

Background and Rationale: Thailand becomes an ageing society. The Thai government officially implemented long-term care (LTC) for dependent older persons in 2016. Sa-ard subdistrict of Namphong, Khon Kaen, has provided an LTC service program by the family care team and the LTC center since August 2017. However, the impacts of this program, particularly social impact, have not been reported. This study aimed to determine social return on investment (SROI) of the LTC program for dependent older persons in this setting. Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was used to collect data on outcomes, program impacts, and costs of the LTC program for dependent older persons (37 people with the Barthel index of activity of daily living (ADL) ≤ 11 points) in the fiscal year 2018. We conducted a questionnaire survey among 74 program beneficiaries (dependent older persons and family caregivers) and focus group inter­views among 49 program stakeholders (dependent older persons, family caregivers, family care team members, trained caregivers, and community and local government representatives). Secondary data were gathered from reports, records, and databases of the hospital, the local government, and the LTC center. SROI was calculated and sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: Outcomes of LTC program delivered better conditions (walkability or doing usual activities by themselves) to the dependent older person group, more relaxation/leisure time and saving costs from going to hospitals to family caregivers, happiness in helping other people to the family care teams and trained caregivers, and the healthy community. Of the total 37 dependent older persons, after participating in the LTC program their ADL increased signifi­cantly on average 3.9 ± 5.2 points (p < 0.001) and 73% had better outcomes. The older persons valued their better outcomes at a median of 708,432 baht (Q1-Q3 = 699,216 - 2,000,000). For a one-year invest­ment of LTC program of 2,138,704 baht and its benefit of 15,853,919 baht, the SROI ratio of this program was 7.4 with a range of sensitivity analysis values between 1.3 and 20.5. Conclusion: This study indicat­ed that the LTC program for older persons could effectively improve their outcomes and provide values to stakeholders and society. The LTC program provided social return higher than investment. Therefore, the LTC program should be promoted and expanded to other settings.

References

Department of Elderly Affair. Older statistics in 77 provinces of Thailand as of 31 December 2020. Available at: http://www.dop.go.th/download/knowledge/th1610815306-335_0.pdf. (in Thai)

World Health Organization. Long-term care in developing countries: ten case studies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.

Lapsomboondee A, Sukpaiboonwat S, Ratniyom A. A comparative study of long term care for elderly in Germany, Japan, Singapore and Thailand. Journal of Business Economics and Communications. 2020;15(1):74-86. (in Thai)

National Health Security Office. Guideline for long-term care system management. 2016. Available at: https://www.nhso.go.th/files/userfiles/file/2016/01แนวทาง59.pdf. (in Thai)

Srithamrongsawat S, Suriyawongpaisal P, Kasemsup V, Aekplakorn W, Leerapan B. A research project for development of long-term care system for dependent elderly under national health insurance system. Bangkok: Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital; 2018. (in Thai)

Vajragupta Y, Kunakornvong W, Phatchana P, Suriyanratakorn S. An effectiveness analysis of the long-term care plans in Udon Thani province. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2018;12(4):608-24. (in Thai)

The SROI Network. A guide to social return on investment. Liverpool: The SROI Network; 2012. Available at: https://socialvalueint.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-SROI-Guide-US-edition.pdf.

Yates BT, Marra M. Introduction: social return on investment (SROI). Eval Program Plann. 2017 Oct;64:95-7.

Banke-Thomas AO, Madaj B, Charles A, Broek N Van Den. Social return on investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015:15:582. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1935-7.

Masters R, Anwar E, Collins B, Cookson R, Capewell S. Return on investment of public health interventions: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug;71(8):827-34.

Thailand Development Research Institute. Social return on investment analysis: elderly and disable people. Bangkok: Thai Health Promotion Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation; 2008. (in Thai)

Chaiyasong S, Sankong N, Saramunee K, Malasai K, Kalapat R. Impacts of dependent elderly care program by family care team in Namphong, Khon Kaen. Nonthaburi: Health Systems Research Institute. 2020. (in Thai)

Scholten P. Value game: a method involving customers in valuing outcomes. 2019. Available at: https://socialvalueint.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ValueGame-Document-FINAL.pdf.

Chandoevwit W, Thampanishvong K. Valuing social relationships and improved health condition among the Thai population. J Happiness Stud 2016;17:2167-89.

Van Exel N, Scholte op Reimer W, Koopmanschap M. Assessment of post-stroke quality of life in cost-effectiveness studies: the usefulness of the Barthel Index and the EuroQoL-5D. Qual Life Res 2004;13:427–33.

Nimdet K, Ngorsuraches S. Willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year for life-saving treatments in Thailand. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e008123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008123.

Jones C, Harfiel N, Brocklehurst P, Lynch M, Edwards RT. Social return on investment analysis of the health precinct community hub for chronic conditions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145249.

Choi JW, Park EC, Lee SG, Park S, Ryu HG, Kim TH. Does long-term care insurance reduce the burden of medical costs? A retrospective elderly cohort study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 Dec;18(12):1641-6.

Downloads

Published

30-03-2022

How to Cite

1.
Chaiyasong S, Sankong N, Saramunee K, Kalapat R, Malasai K, Yutipan N, Rattanapakorn P, Phuworakij M. Social Return on Investment of Long-Term Care for Dependent Older Persons: A Case Study of Sa-Ard Subdistrict, Namphong, Khon Kaen. J Health Syst Res [internet]. 2022 Mar. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 30];16(1):16-33. available from: https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/j_hsr/article/view/3474

Issue

Section

Original article