Evaluation of SASUK OON-CHAI, a Supportive Process for Organizational Health Literacy Improvement for Government Health Care Units
Keywords:
health literate organization, organizational health literacy, SASUK OON-CHAI, evaluative study design, governmental health care organizationsAbstract
Organizational health literacy [OHL] helps health care organizations achieve high-quality, efficient, and meaningful care to service users, called health literate health care organizations [HLO]. OHL is defined by the Institute of Medicine as “the degree to which an organization implements policies, practices, and systems that make it easier for people to navigate, understand, and use information and its services to take care of their health.” As OHL was a new term in Thailand, there were needs to raise awareness and promote OHL practices at governmental health care organizations. This study was to evaluate the effect of “SASUK OON-CHAI”, a supportive web-based processes for OHL at governmental health care organizations under the Ministry of Public Health. The supportive processes were initiated by the Division of Health Literacy and Health Communication, Department of Health. An evaluative study design was employed to investigate the effects of SASUK OON-CHAI on OHL of governmental health care organizations that registered to participate in interactive online monthly meetings (group 1) and compared with organizations voluntarily chose to self-study the OHL (group 2). The OHL practices were reflected by the staff and service users before and after each health care organization developed and submitted their development plans. The percentages of staff and service users who perceived the OHL practices were compared between the pre-test and post-test using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and between the two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. The significance level is .05. Cohen’s D was calculated to indicate the effect size. Results: 455 organizations assessed their OHL practices at least twice with a minimum time interval of one month and their OHL practices were used for the evaluation. 248 chose to participate in the interactive online monthly meetings and 207 chose to self-study. There were statistically significant improvements in the OHL practices of both groups with a small effect size [group 1: pre-test 95.47%, SD = 5.99, post-test 96.95%, SD = 5.51, p = 0.000; group 2: pre-test 96.61%, SD = 6.77, post-test 97.83%, SD = 4.01, p = 0.002). At the pre-test, group 1 had a significantly lower percentage of the OHL practices (p = 0.000), but at the post-test, this percentage was not statistically different from that of group 2 (p = 0.139). Conclusion: Either OHL practices by registering in SASUK OON-CHAI and participating monthly online meetings or self-studying the OHL practices helped improve OHL.
References
Farmanova E, Bonneville L, Bouchard L. Organizational health literacy: review of theories, frameworks, guides, and implementation Issues. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing. 2018;55:0046958018757848.
Brega AG, Hamer MK, Albright K, Brach C, Saliba D, Abbey D, et al. Organizational health literacy: quality improvement measures with expert consensus. HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(2):e127-e46.
Brach C, Keller D, Hernandez LM, Baur C, Parker R, Dreyer B, et al. Ten attributes of health literate health care organizations. NAM perspectives. 2012.
Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC public health. 2012;12(1):1-13.
Kruzliakova N, Porter K, Ray PA, Hedrick V, Brock DJ, Zoellner J. Understanding and advancing organizational health literacy within a public health setting. Health Lit Res Pract. 2021;5(1):e35-e48.
Department of Health. Handbooks for developing health literate organizations. Nonthaburi: Department of Health; 2019. (in Thai)
Thailand Health Literacy Promotion Association. Criteria and guidelines for health literate organization accreditation. Bangkok: Thansumrit; 2021.
Kloyiam S, Sukprasert K, Charoenpao P, Reungpradub S, Suddaeng S, Roma W. Development of indicators and framework for monitoring and evaluating progress of health literate organizations for public organizations. Thailand Journal of Health Promotion and Environmental Health. 2020;43(1):19-32.
Coleman CA, Fromer A. A health literacy training intervention for physicians and other health professionals. Fam Med. 2015;47(5):388-92.
Dhand N, Khatkar M. Sample size calculator for comparing two independent means. Statulator: an online statistical calculator. 2014.
Löhr K, Weinhardt M, Sieber S. The “World Café” as a participatory method for collecting qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2020;19:1609406920916976.
Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www R-project org/.2013.
Chongsuvivatwong V. epicalc: Epidemiological calculator. R package version. 2012;2(1.0).
Brach C. The journey to become a health literate organization: a snapshot of health system improvement. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2017;240:203.
Murphy KM, Topel RH. Diminishing returns?: The costs and benefits of improving health. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2003;46(3):S108-28.
Perrault EK. The diminishing returns for longer healthcare provider video biographies: a thin slice examination of patient decision-making. Health Communication. 2021;36(5):650-8.
Zhang Y, Tang S, Pei S, Yan S, Jiang S, Zheng Z. Health behavior spreading with similar diminishing returns effect. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2015;425:18-26.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Health Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of Health Systems Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.