Feasibility and Acceptability of Health Maintenance Organizations for Medical Care Service under the Social Security System: Policy Research

Authors

  • Chanida Lertpitakpong Department of Public Health Administration, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Boonsong Thapchaiyuth Social Security Office, Thailand
  • Piya Hanvoravongchai Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand

Keywords:

social security system, medical service, health maintenance organization (HMO), primary care, health policy research

Abstract

Health maintenance organization (HMO) is one of interesting models for responding to Social Security Office’s (SSO) medical service developments. Therefore, feasibility and acceptability of stakeholders were needed to be studied for further planning decisions. Methodology: This policy research study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of three proposed HMO models with the SSO transforming into supervisory and monitoring roles. Model one was the HMO through a large private hospital network; model two, HMO through the public health insurance or regional health system; and model three; HMO through a private insurance company. Four key informants groups were selected by using purposive sampling including 1) policy executives serving as HMOs, 2) service providers, 3) service users, and 4) executives or experts with relevant roles. Qualitative data were collected, and content analysis was performed. Results: HMO model two was the most feasible model regarding service area coverage, economies of scale, experiences of management and credibility, etc. However, there were other challenges such as regional health system capacity. Stakeholders concerned that insurer’s overhead cost would take away the desirable benefits of service users, especially in private HMOs that might have a for-profit culture. Some opinions suggested on more precise improvements of the current system instead of establishing HMOs. In addition, they disagreed on the sub-district health promoting hospital acting as gatekeeper at primary care level, as this would deprive user’s rights and create barrier of access to health services. Conclusion and discussion: Although the proposed HMO model two was considered the most possible, skeptics were on limited competitions within the HMOs. HMOs might not reduce the health expenditures because of overhead cost and long-term investment in primary care system. Further study should consider possible competitive HMO models or other HMOs in Thailand such as medical schools network.

References

Pinprateep P. The direction of the health system reform in the current era: the 31st Honorable Aree Valyasevi Speech. Bangkok: 3D Printing Equipment; 2018. 42 p. (in Thai)

Pokpermdee P. Twenty-year national strategic plan for public health (B.E. 2561-2580). Journal of Health Science 2020;29(1):173-86. (in Thai)

Bureau of Policy and Strategy, Ministry of Public Health. Thai Public Health 2011-2015. Bangkok: WVO Office of the Printing Mill; 2016. 488 p. (in Thai)

Research and Development Division. Social Security Office Annual Report 2020 [internet]. Nonthaburi: Social Security Office; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 28]. Available from: https://www.sso.go.th/wpr/assets/upload/files_storage/sso_th/b5ccdc72a0f03b95b8e3ac1df3f80025.pdf.

Locock L. The changing nature of rationing in the UK National Health Service. Public Administration 2002;78(1):91-109.

Siverbo S. The purchaser-provider split in principle and practice: experiences from Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management 2004;20(4):401-20.

PiraveJ N, Sakunphanit T, Suknark K, Panyadee S, Aueasiriwon B, Wongsin U, et al. Hospital management models for social security beneficiaries. Final report. Nonthaburi: Social Security Fund, Social Security Office; 2014. (in Thai)

Pichitpong S. The study to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of Medical Services System of Social Security Office. Final report. Nonthaburi: Social Security Fund. Social Security Office; 2016. (in Thai)

Medical Board Announcement according to the Social Security Act. Criteria and rates of health promotion and disease prevention fees for borne benefits in the case of suffering harm or illness being not due to work (No. 2) [internet]. Bangkok: Office of the official information commission; 2019 [cited 2022 Feb 28]. Available from: http://www.oic.go.th/FILEWEB/CABINFOCENTER39/DRAWER075/GENERAL/DATA0000/00000796.PDF. (in Thai)

Falkson SR, Srinivasan VN. Health Maintenance Organization. [updated 2022 Mar 9]. In: StatPearls [internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan. Available from: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554454/.

Dorsey JL. The Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-222) and prepaid group practice plans. Med Care 1975;13(1):1-9.

Navarro RP, Cahill JA. Role of managed care in the U.S. Healthcare system. In: Navarro RP, editor. Managed Care Pharmacy Practice. 2nd ed. Canada, US: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2009. p. 1-16.

Fox PD, Kongstvedt PR. A history of managed health care and health insurance in the United States. In: Fox PD, Kongstvedt PR, editors. The essentials of managed health care. 6th ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2013. p. 1-36.

Gruber LR, Shadle M, Polich CL. From movement to industry: the growth of HMOs. Health Aff (Millwood) 1988;7(3):197-208.

Selevan J, Kindermann D, Pines JM, Fields WW. What accountable care organizations can learn from Kaiser permanente California’s acute care strategy. Popul Health Manag 2015;18(4):233-6.

Carnoy J, Koo L. Kaiser-permanente: a model American health maintenance organization. Int J Health Serv 1974;4(4):599-615.

Pines J, Selevan J, Mestay F, George M, MeClellan M. Kaiser permanente - California: a model for integrated care for the ill and injured [internet]. Washington, DC: The Brooking Institution; 2015 [cited 2022 Feb 28]. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/KaiserFor-matted_150504RH-with-image.pdf.

CalPERS Board of Administration, the Public Employees’ Medical & Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA). Kaiser permanente basic plan: health maintenance organization (HMO). Sacramento, CA: CalPERS; 2018 [cited 2022 Dec 15] Available from: https://www.calpers.ca.gov/docs/2018-kaiser-basic-ev-idence-coverage.pdf.

Miles MB, Huberman M, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2020.

Hanvoravongchai P, Lertpitakpong C. Health maintenance organization (HMO): a guideline for organizing medical services in the form of health network organization for social security system. Final report. Nonthaburi: Social Security Fund. Social Security Office; 2017. (in Thai)

Obikeze E, Onwujekwe O. The roles of health maintenance organizations in the implementation of a social health insurance scheme in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria: a mixed-method investigation. Int J Equity Health 2020;19(1):33.

Akinbode JO, Sokefun EA, Aremu MO. Appraisal of health maintenance organisations’ performance in the Nigerian healthcare service sector. J Healthc Eng 2019;2019:6820609.

Lagoe R, Aspling DL, Westert GP. Current and future developments in managed care in the United States and implications for Europe. Health Res Policy Syst 2005;3(1):4.

Erdmann Y, Renate Wilson. Managed care: a view from Europe. Annual Review of Public Health 2001;22(22):273–91.

Biles B, Casillas G, Guterman S. Does medicare advantage cost less than traditional medicare?. Commonwealth Fund Pub. 2016;issue brief 2(1858):1-9.

Hellinger FJ, Wong HS. Selection bias in HMOs: a review of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev 2000;57(4):405-39.

Tulchinsky TH, Varavikova EA. The new public health. 3rd ed. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2014.

L.E.K. Consulting. What the EU can learn about managed care from the US [internet]. 2019. [cited 2021 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.lek.com/sites/default/files/ insights/pdf-attachments/US-Managed-Care-Solutions.pdf.

Cotton P, Newhouse JP, Volpp KG, Fendrick AM, Oesterle SL, Oungpasuk P, et al. Medicare advantage: issues, insights, and implications for the future. Popul Health Manag 2016;19(S3):S1-S8.

Downloads

Published

29-03-2023

How to Cite

1.
Lertpitakpong C, Thapchaiyuth B, Hanvoravongchai P. Feasibility and Acceptability of Health Maintenance Organizations for Medical Care Service under the Social Security System: Policy Research. J Health Syst Res [internet]. 2023 Mar. 29 [cited 2025 Sep. 12];17(1):5-27. available from: https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/j_hsr/article/view/3208

Issue

Section

original article