The Review of Country’s Global Health Strategy Development Process and the Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanism of Global Health Strategy in Eight Countries
Keywords:
Thailand global health strategic framework, global health strategy, global health issue, evaluation of global health policyAbstract
This study aimed to explore process for the selection of global health issues, frameworks for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) activities, and the management of global health strategies internationally, and to provide recommendations on future development process of Thailand’s global health strategy. This study collected data through descriptive literature search and document reviews. Literature search was conducted from July to August 2017 and was updated in August 2019. Global health strategies of eight countries were selected as case studies, namely Canada, Japan, Norway, the USA, Switzerland, England, Australia, and Thailand.
This study found that in most countries, the ministries of foreign affairs were responsible for the development and the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of global health strategy. The widely used principles for the selection of global health issues comprised: (1) the globally threathening health problems which also threatened own country, and (2) the country’s public health and foreign policies. Deliberative discussion and consultation with stakeholders were the methods that all eight countries employed to select global health issues for the development of their global health strategic framework. There was no evidence of using quantitative methods or weighting methods for selection of global health issues. The main principles underpinning the M&E activities focused on: (1) incorporating the M&E activities as an integral part of the global health strategic framework at the beginning of the process; (2) evaluating both outcomes and impacts (if possible) and (3) appropriately designing the M&E process that fits with the implementation of the strategic framework.
References
Hemachidha C, Rosenfield AG. National health services and family planning: Thailand, a case study. American Journal of Public Health. 1975;65(8):864-71.
Ainsworth M, Beyrer C, Soucat A. AIDS and public policy: the lessons and challenges of “success” in Thailand. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2003;64(1):13-37.
Prakongsai P, Limwattananon S, Tangcharoensathien V. The equity impact of the universal coverage policy: lessons from Thailand. Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research. 2009;21:57-81.
Kickbusch I. Global health diplomacy: how foreign policy can influence health. BMJ. 2011;342:d3154.
Bureau of International Health. Thailand global health strategic framework 2016-2020. Nonthaburi: Bureau of International Health, Office of the Permanent Secretary; 2017.
Kickbusch I. The need for a European strategy on global health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2006;34(6):561-5.
Battams S, Matlin S. Global health diplomacy briefing: discussing a definition of global health. Geneva: The Graduate Institute Geneva: global health programme; 2013. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/4133217/Discussing_a_definition_of_Global_Health._Policy_Brief.
Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. The Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1993-5.
World Bank. Classifying countries by income World Bank; 2018 [updated 4 October 2018. Available from: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/stories/the-classification-of-countries-by-income.html.
Yothasamut J, Saengsri W, Luankongsomchit V, Tantivess S. Mid-term review of Thailand global health strategy 2016-2020. Nonthaburi: Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program; 2019. (in Thai)
Global Health Division. Thailand global health strategic action plan 2016-2020. Nonthaburi: Ministry of Public Health; 2017. (in Thai)
Global Affairs Canada. Global Affairs Canada: departmental plan 2019-20. Toronto: Global Affairs Canada; n.d. Available from: https://www.international.gc.ca/gac-amc/assets/pdfs/publications/plans/dp-pm/dp-pm_1920_en.pdf?_ga=2.230471253.837107024.1567394646-1213143930.1567394646.
Global Affairs Canada. Global Affairs Canada: report on plans and priorities 2016-17. Toronto: Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development (DFATD); n.d. Available from: https://www.international.gc.ca/gac-amc/assets/pdfs/publications/plans/rpp/RPP_2016_2017_ENG.pdf.
Government of Japan. Japan’s strategy on global health diplomacy 2013. Available from: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/files/000005946.pdf.
Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Global health in foreign and development policy. Norwegian: Ministry of Foreign Affairs; 2012. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/dc5be7cf9f4e41ca9ff5cd165a1d1c69/en-gb/pdfs/stm201120120011000en_pdfs.pdf.
U.S. Government. Implementation of global health initiatives: consultation documents. U.S. Government, ; 2009. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/2760E0ED9BDB5FB9492576C4001C08CD-govt.usa-feb2010.pdf.
Swiss Agency for Development and Coorperation SDC. Strategic framework 2015-2019 SDC Global health programme. Bern: Swiss Agency for Development and Coorperation SDC Global Health Programme; 2015. Available from: https://www.shareweb.ch/site/Health/publiclibrary/Public%20Library/Strategic%20Framework%202015%E2%80%932019%20SDC%20Global%20Programme%20Health.pdf.
Public Health England. Global health strategy 2014 to 2019. London: Public Health England; 2014. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/354156/Global_Health_Strategy_final_version_for_publication_12_09_14.pdf.
Australian Government: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Heath for Development Strategy 2015-2020. Barton: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade; 2015. Available from: https://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/health-for-development-strategy-2015-2020.PDF.
Abe S. Japan’s strategy for global health diplomacy: why it matters. Lancet (London, England). 2013;382(9896):915-6.
Sugiyama H, Yamaguchi A, Murakami H. Japan’s global health policy: developing a comprehensive approach in a period of economic stress. Washington: Centre for Strategic and International Studies; 2013. Available from: https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/130506_Sugiyama_JapanGlobalHealth_web.pdf.
“Promoting Global Health” L’Aquila G8 Health Experts’ Report G7 Information Centre 2009. Available from: http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/summit/2009laquila/2009-experts-health.pdf.
Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation. The U.S. Government and global health. San Francisco: Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation; 2019. Available from: http://files.kff.org/attachment/fact-sheet-The-US-Government-and-Global-Health.
Alcorn T. What has the US Global Health Initiative achieved? The Lancet. 2012;380(9849):1215-6.
US Government. The United States: Government Global Health Initiative. U.S. Government; n.d. Available from: https://icma.org/sites/default/files/303407_USAID%20Global%20Health%20Initiative.pdf.
Measure Evaluation. United States Government. Global health principles monitoring and evaluation resource guide: Measure Evaluation; 2014. Available from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/ms-14-85.
WHO South-East Asia. WHO country cooperation strategy: Thailand 2017-2021. Nonthaburi: WHO South-East Asia; 2017.
Kirton J OJGJ. The case for a global health strategy for Canada. Prepared for the Strategic Policy Branch in the International Affairs Directorate of Health Canada Toronto Global Health Diplomacy Program, Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto; 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of Health Systems Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
