The Assessment of Physical Activity Programs Implementation in the Thai Urban-Setting against the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity Strategic Actions

Authors

  • Thitikorn Topothai International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health
  • Chompoonut Topothai International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health
  • Viroj Tangcharoensathien International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health
  • Orratai Waleewong International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health
  • Weerasak Putthasri National Health Commission Office

Keywords:

physical activity, urban, assessment, community-based, Thailand

Abstract

Physical inactivity is ranked number four leading risk factor of premature deaths from non-commu­nicable diseases. The Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018-2030 (GAPPA), adopted in the 71st World Health Assembly in 2018 emphasizes the need for a whole-of-society approach to creating social, cultural, economic, and environments conducive to physical activity. This study assessed the promotion of physical activity in the urban setting of twelve selected municipalities in Thailand against the four GAPPA strategic actions. The findings revealed that all twelve municipalities implemented at least one intervention of the four strategic actions, and achieved 12 out of 20 (60%) GAPPA recommended actions. The city municipalities achieved the highest score, followed by the town and the subdistrict municipalities. The highest achievements were the implementations of strategic action 3: create active people, and strategic action 1: create active societies. This study showed that GAPPA recommendations were relevant and feasible in the Thai context. However, gaps remained in the promotion of strategic action 2: create active environments, and strategic action 4: create active systems. In conclusion, the municipality could be one of the lead agencies for physical activity promotion in an urban setting in collaboration with other public and private stakeholders. GAPPA strategic actions should be translated to be specific tools and indicators for monitoring the progress of policy implementation.

References

Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219-29.

World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

World Health Organization. Global status report on non-communicable diseases 2014. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

World Health Organization. Global health observatory data: prevalence of insufficient physical activity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2020 Apr 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/physical_activity_text/en/.

Katewongsa P, Widyastaria DA, Saonuam P, Haematulin N, Wongsingha N. The effects of COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity of the Thai population: evidence from Thailand’s surveillance on physical activity 2020. J Sport Health Sci. 2020.

Thailand Physical Activity Knowledge Development Center. Regenerating physical activity in Thailand after COVID-19 pandemic. Nakornpathom: Thailand Physical Activity Knowledge Development Center; 2020. (in Thai)

World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

Division of Physical Activity and Health, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health. Thailand Physical Activity Strategy 2018-2030. Bangkok: NC Concept; 2018. (in Thai)

United Nations. World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2018.

Liangruenrom N, Topothai T, Topothai C, Suriyawongpaisal W, Limwattananon S, Limwattananon C, et al. Do Thai people meet recommended physical activity level?: The 2015 national health and welfare survey. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2017;11(2):205-20. (in Thai)

Topothai T, Liangruenrom N, Topothai C, Suriyawongpaisal W, Limwattananon S, Limwattananon C, et al. How much of energy expenditure from physical activity and sedentary behavior of Thai adults: The 2015 national health and welfare survey. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2017;11(3):327-44. (in Thai)

Topothai T, Topothai C, Pongutta S, Suriyawongpaisal W, Chandrasiri O, Thamarangsi T. The daily energy expenditure of 4 domains of physical activity of Thai adults. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2015;9(2):168-80. (in Thai)

Tuangratananon T, Liangruenrom N, Topothai T, Topothai C, Limwattananon S, Limwattananon C, et al. Differences in physical activity levels between urban and rural adults in Thailand: findings from the 2015 national health and welfare survey. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2018;12(1):27-41. (in Thai)

Tuangratananon T, Topothai T, Khamput T, Saengruang N, Kosiyaporn H, Kulthanmanusorn A, et al. Public policy and social determinants of health management at three levels of municipalities in Thailand. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2018;12(3):384-403. (in Thai)

Royal Thai Government Gazette. Determining plans and process of decentralization to local government organization act B.E. 2542 (1999). Bangkok: Royal Cabinet; 1999. (in Thai)

Khamput T, Patsorn K, Thongbo T, Seunglee S, Keryai T, Sangsamritpol W, et al. Administration of physical activity promotion by twelve local administrative organizations in Thailand. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2019;13(1):63-89. (in Thai)

Division of Physical Activity and Health, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health. 12 local authority models on physical activity promotion. Nonthaburi: Informan Teem Computer; 2018.

Division of Physical Activity and Health, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health. Recommendation on physical activity promotion administration by local authorities. Nonthaburi: Informan Teem Computer; 2018.

Royal Thai Government Gazette. Public Health Ministerial Regulations 2009. Bangkok: Royal Thai Government Gazette; 2009. Available from: http://www.oic.go.th/FILEWEB/CABIN-FOCENTER17/DRAWER002/GENERAL/DATA0000/00000810.PDF. (in Thai)

Giles-Corti B, Vernez-Moudon A, Reis R, Turrell G, Dannenberg AL, Badland H, et al. City planning and population health: a global challenge. The Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2912-24.

Gotschi T, de Nazelle A, Brand C, Gerike R, Consortium P. Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework of active travel behavior: a review and synthesis of published frameworks. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017;4(3):286-95.

Kim EJ, Kim J, Kim H. Does environmental walkability matter? The role of walkable environment in active commuting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(4):1261.

Audrey S, Fisher H, Cooper A, Gaunt D, Metcalfe C, Garfield K, et al. Public health research. A workplace-based intervention to increase levels of daily physical activity: the travel to work cluster RCT. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019.

Gelius P, Messing S, Goodwin L, Schow D, Abu-Omar K. What are effective policies for promoting physical activity? A systematic review of reviews. Prev Med Rep. 2020;18:101095.

Topothai T, Topothai C, Suphanchaimat R, Chandrasiri O, Sukaew T, Putthasri W, et al. The promotion of walking and biking for transportation, and public transport using: a case study in four communities in Thailand. Nonthaburi: International Health Policy Program; 2020.

Division of Physical Activity and Health, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health. Thailand action plan on physical activity 2018-2020. Bangkok: NC Concept; 2018. (in Thai)

Topothai T, Piyathawornanan C, Asawutmangkul U. Lessons learnt from developing and implementing the national steps challenge in Thailand. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2020;14(4):478-88. (in Thai)

Topothai T, Suphanchaimat R, Tangcharoensathien V, Putthasri W, Sukaew T, Asawutmangkul U, et al. Daily step counts from the first Thailand national steps challenge in 2020: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(22):8433.

WHO Regional Office for Europe. Healthy cities around the world. An overview of the healthy cities movement in the six WHO regions. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2003 [cited 2021 Jan 7]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/101526/healthycityworld.pdf.

WHO Regional Office for Europe. Promoting physical activity and active living in urban environments: the role of local governments. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006.

WHO Regional Office for Europe. A healthy city is an active city: a physical activity planning guide. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2008.

WHO Regional Office for Europe. Healthy cities: promoting health and equity – evidence for local policy and practice. Summary evaluation of Phase V (2009-2013) of the WHO European Healthy Cities Network. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2014.

WHO Regional Office for Europe. Health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) policy audit tool. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2015.

Topothai T, Topothai C, Suphanchaimat R, Chandrasiri O, Sukaew T, Putthasri W, et al. Physical activity, carbon dioxide emission and cost of transport: a case study of three communities in Thailand. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2020;14(4):458-77.

Downloads

Published

30-03-2022

How to Cite

1.
Topothai T, Topothai C, Tangcharoensathien V, Waleewong O, Putthasri W. The Assessment of Physical Activity Programs Implementation in the Thai Urban-Setting against the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity Strategic Actions. J Health Syst Res [internet]. 2022 Mar. 30 [cited 2025 Nov. 17];16(1):69-84. available from: https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/j_hsr/article/view/3479

Issue

Section

Original article