Factors Influencing Outcomes of Performance of NCD Clinic Plus in Hospitals in Health Region 6

Main Article Content

Naphatsinee Nongpraow
Thanasuk Koyta
Charnchai Manafao

Abstract

This retrospective evaluation study was designed to examine the performance and analyze factors influencing the outcomes of NCD Clinic Plus implementation among hospitals in Health Region 6. The study sample comprised 73 hospitals under the Ministry of Public Health that participated in the NCD Clinic Plus Online assessment in the fiscal year 2024. The research instrument was the standard NCD Clinic Plus assessment form, which consists of four parts: (1) general information of the health care facility, (2) quality development processes across six components, (3) service outcome indicators comprising 13 indicators, and (4) continuous quality improvement (CQI). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, as well as inferential statistics using multiple linear regression analysis.            The results showed that most hospitals (67.13%) met the assessment criteria, with small hospitals having the highest passing proportion (82.9%). The analysis identified ten significant predictors explaining 87.3% of the variance in performance outcomes (Adjusted R² = 0.873, p < 0.05). These predictors included self-management support systems, decision-support systems, key screening and control indicators for diabetes and hypertension (KPI2, KPI3, KPI8–KPI10, KPI13), quality improvement outcomes (CQI2), and hospital size (SIZE_HPT). The findings indicate that effective implementation of NCD Clinic Plus requires an integrated care system that emphasizes both process and outcome dimensions. Strengthening patient self-management, data-driven clinical decision-making, and continuous quality improvement are essential strategies for enhancing service quality and achieving sustainable population health outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Nongpraow N, Koyta T, Manafao C. Factors Influencing Outcomes of Performance of NCD Clinic Plus in Hospitals in Health Region 6. JDH [internet]. 2026 Feb. 4 [cited 2026 Feb. 23];1(3):44-5. available from: https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDHh/article/view/3936
Section
Original article

References

World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases: fact sheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases progress monitor 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

Aekplakorn W, Suriyawongpaisal P, Siriamornpun S, et al. Assessing a national policy on strengthening chronic care at the primary health care level in Thailand: a perceptions survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:233.

U.S. Commercial Service. Thailand healthcare non-communicable diseases market intelligence. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Commerce; 2025.

Department of Disease Control. Guidelines for implementation of NCD Clinic Plus 2024. Nonthaburi: Ministry of Public Health; 2024. (in Thai)

Department of Disease Control. NCD Clinic Plus Online: quality assessment results of NCD Clinic Plus 2024 [Internet]. Nonthaburi: Ministry of Public Health; 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 9]. Available from: https://ncdclinicplus.ddc.moph.go.th (in Thai)

Department of Disease Control. National report on NCD Clinic Plus implementation, 2022. Nonthaburi: Ministry of Public Health; 2022. (in Thai)

Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(6):64–78.

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Quality improvement essentials toolkit. Boston (MA): Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2021.

Lorga T, Srivanichakorn S, Prasopchoke M, et al. Continuity of care and diabetic outcomes in primary care settings in Thailand. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:953.

Rojroongwasinkul N, Sriwaranun Y, Seubsman S, et al. Factors associated with glycemic control among Thai patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0243721.

Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Neil HAW, Matthews DR. Long-term follow-up after tight control of blood pressure in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1565-76.