In vitro antibacterial activity of newly combined povidone–iodine plus lidocaine throat spray against Streptococcus pyogenes

Authors

  • Tienake Trisauvapak Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand
  • Surapat Assawawiroonhakarn Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand
  • Chompunuch Klinmalai Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Lidocaine, Povidone–iodine (PVP-I), Throat spray, Streptococcus pyogenes

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, streptococcal pharyngitis is difficult to distinguish from self-limited viral pharyngitis, resulting in overuse of antibacterial agents in patients with acute pharyngitis. Povidone–iodine (PVP-I) oral preparation could be a treatment option for throat infection, sparing the risk of antibiotic resistance of throat microflora. However, research on the antibacterial effect of PVP-I throat sprays, which typically contain lower concentrations of PVP-I compared to other PVP-I oral preparations, against Streptococcus pyogenes is limited and most commercial PVP-I oral preparations contain no ingredients with analgesic activity. Thus, few studies have focused on the effect of analgesics on antibacterial activity of PVP-I oral preparations.

Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate in vitro bactericidal activity of a newly developed, combined antiseptic–analgesic oral throat spray of PVP-I plus lidocaine against S. pyogenes.

Methods: Antibacterial activity of combined 0.45% PVP-I plus 0.3% lidocaine throat spray against a reference strain of S. pyogenes was demonstrated using the bactericidal quantitative suspension test EN13727:2012 + A2:2015. The test product was serially diluted to 0.09%, 0.045%, 0.009%, 0.0045%, 0.00045% and 0.000045% PVP-I solution. Suspensions of the reference strain were added to the PVP-I test solutions for 30 seconds under dirty conditions and then spread on blood agar plates. Colony growth on each plate was counted and compared with a negative control sample to evaluate the antibacterial effect of the tested solutions.

Results: On 0.45%, 0.09%, 0.045% and 0.009% PVP-I plates, no surviving S. pyogenes colonies were observed after 24 h of incubation at 37°C. On those plates with visible bacterial colonies, colony count was inversely correlated with concentration of PVP-I. Compared with negative control plates, 0.0045% and 0.00045% PVP-I plates showed 97.45% and 93.33% colony growth reduction, respectively.

Conclusion: PVP-I, at concentrations of at least 0.009%, has demonstrated effective antibacterial activity against S. pyogenes in vitro. Therefore, a throat spray formulation containing 0.45% PVP-I, which is 50 times more concentrated than 0.009% PVP-I, is capable of inhibiting bacterial growth. This concentration may also alleviate concerns regarding clinical use, as the PVP-I concentration could be reduced through physiological dilution or clearance mechanisms in vivo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bisno AL. Acute pharyngitis: Etiology and diagnosis. Pediatrics. 1996;97:949-54.

Ebell MH, Smith MA, Barry HC, Ives K, Carey M. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have strep throat? JAMA. 2000;284:2912-8.

Anderson NW, Buchan BW, Mayne D, Mortensen JE, Mackey TL, Ledeboer NA. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the illumigene group a streptococcus DNA amplification assay for detection of group a streptococcus from pharyngeal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1474-7.

Robertson KA, Volmink JA, Mayosi BM. Antibiotics for the primary prevention of acute rheumatic fever: A meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5:11.

Del Mar CB, Glasziou PP, Spinks AB. Antibiotics for sore throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000:Cd000023.

Shulman ST, Bisno AL, Clegg HW, Gerber MA, Kaplan EL, Lee G, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: 2012 update by the Infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:e86-102.

Eggers M, Koburger-Janssen T, Eickmann M, Zorn J. In vitro bactericidal and virucidal efficacy of povidone-iodine gargle/mouthwash against respiratory and oral tract pathogens. Infect Dis Ther. 2018;7:249-59.

Sauerbrei A. Bactericidal and virucidal activity of ethanol and povidone-iodine. Microbiologyopen. 2020;9:e1097.

Shiraishi T, Nakagawa Y. Evaluation of the bactericidal activity of povidone-iodine and commercially available gargle preparations. Dermatology. 2002;204:37-41.

Yoneyama A, Shimizu M, Tabata M, Yashiro J, Takata T, Hikida M. In vitro short-time killing activity of povidone-iodine (Isodine Gargle) in the presence of oral organic matter. Dermatology. 2006;212:103-8.

Nakagawa T, Hosaka Y, Ishihara K, Hiraishi T, Sato S, Ogawa T, et al. The efficacy of povidone-iodine products against periodontopathic bacteria. Dermatology. 2006;212:109-11.

Hosaka Y, Saito A, Maeda R, Fukaya C, Morikawa S, Makino A, et al. Antibacterial activity of povidone-iodine against an artificial biofilm of porphyromonas gingivalis and fusobacterium nucleatum. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57:364-8.

Suzuki T, Kataoka H, Ida T, Kamachi K, Mikuniya T. Bactericidal activity of topical antiseptics and their gargles against bordetella pertussis. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18:272-5.

Kanagalingam J, Feliciano R, Hah JH, Labib H, Le TA, Lin JC. Practical use of povidone-iodine antiseptic in the maintenance of oral health and in the prevention and treatment of common oropharyngeal infections. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69:1247-56.

Tan EL, Johari NH. Comparative in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of povidone-iodine and other commercially available antiseptics against clinically relevant pathogens. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2021;16:Doc05.

Boden JH, Myers ML, Lee T, Bushley DM, Torres MF. Effect of lidocaine gel on povidone-iodine antisepsis and microbial survival. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1773-5.

Doshi RR, Leng T, Fung AE. Povidone-iodine before lidocaine gel anesthesia achieves surface antisepsis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011;42:346-9.

Xia J, Lyons RJ, Lin MY, Khalifa YM, LaRock CN. Combination of lidocaine gel and povidone-iodine to decrease acquired infections in procedures performed using topical anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:1047-50.

Odden JL, Kowalski RP, Friberg TR. Lidocaine gel interferes with the antibacterial activity of povidone-iodine. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:S13-s6.

EN 13727:2012+A2:2015. Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics. Quantitative suspension test for the evaluation of bactericidal activity in the medical area. Test method and requirements (phase 2, step 1).

Haley CE, Marling-Cason M, Smith JW, Luby JP, Mackowiak PA. Bactericidal activity of antiseptics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21:991-2.

Gorman SP, Scott EM, Hutchinson EP. Effects of aqueous and alcoholic povidone-iodine on spores of Bacillus subtilis. J Appl Bacteriol. 1985;59:99-105.

McLure AR, Gordon J. In-vitro evaluation of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect. 1992;21:291-9.

Goldenheim PD. In vitro efficacy of povidone-iodine solution and cream against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Postgrad Med J. 1993;69:S62-5.

Traoré O, Fayard SF, Laveran H. An in-vitro evaluation of the activity of povidone-iodine against nosocomial bacterial strains. J Hosp Infect. 1996;34:217-22.

Rikimaru T, Kondo M, Kondo S, Oizumi K. Bactericidal activities of povidone-iodine against Mycobacterium. Dermatology. 1997;195:104-6.

Shimizu M, Okuzumi K, Yoneyama A, Kunisada T, Araake M, Ogawa H, et al. In vitro antiseptic susceptibility of clinical isolates from nosocomial infections. Dermatology. 2002;204:21-7.

Anderson MJ, David ML, Scholz M, Bull SJ, Morse D, Hulse-Stevens M, et al. Efficacy of skin and nasal povidone-iodine preparation against mupirocin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and S. aureus within the anterior nares. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2765-73.

Smock E, Demertzi E, Abdolrasouli A, Azadian B, Williams G. Antiseptic efficacy of povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate skin preparation solutions used in burns surgery. J Burn Care Res. 2018;39:440-4.

Sneaker W. Drug discovery: A history. New York: Wiley. 2005.

Nobukuni K, Hayakawa N, Namba R, Ihara Y, Sato K, Takada H, et al. The influence of long-term treatment with povidone-iodine on thyroid function. Dermatology. 1997;195:69-72.

Ramezanpour M, Smith JLP, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. In vitro safety evaluation of a povidone-iodine solution applied to human nasal epithelial cells. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10:1141-8.

Frank S, Capriotti J, Brown SM, Tessema B. Povidone-iodine use in sinonasal and oral cavities: A review of safety in the COVID-19 era. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020;99:586-93.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Trisauvapak, T. ., Assawawiroonhakarn, S., & Klinmalai, C. (2025). In vitro antibacterial activity of newly combined povidone–iodine plus lidocaine throat spray against Streptococcus pyogenes. Thai Journal of Pediatrics, 64(4), 49–59. retrieved from https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJP/article/view/3536

Issue

Section

Original Articles