Treatment outcomes of clotting factor concentrates in patients with hemophilia

Authors

  • Julalak Khotprada Department of Pediatrics, Khon Kaen Hospital

Keywords:

Hemophilia, Prophylaxis treatment, Episodic treatment, Barriers

Abstract

background: Hemophilia is a genetic bleeding disorder that is characterized by easy bleeding and difficulty stopping bleeding due to a lack of clotting factors. Controlling bleeding symptoms has led to the development of treatments involving concentrated factors extracted from plasma to replace the missing factor VIII or IX. This includes treatments for episodic bleeding and prophylaxis, which yield different outcomes. Additionally, there are barriers affecting these treatments.

Objective: To evaluate treatment outcomes of clotting factor concentrate therapy and identify barriers to hemophilia management in children.

Method: A retrospective study was conducted in patients aged from birth to 21 years who were diagnosed between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022. Data record included sex, age, date of birth, date of diagnosis, type of hemophilia, severity level, factor inhibitor level, type of treatment, age at the start of prophylaxis treatment, frequency and dose of prophylaxis treatment, factor injector provider, annual bleeding rate during episodic clotting factor concentrate and prophylaxis treatment, number of hospital visits, annual bleeding rate after continuous prophylaxis treatment with a follow-up period of 1 year, target joint and obstacles affecting hemophilia treatment. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Among 18 patients diagnosed with hemophilia at Khon Kaen Hospital, the median annual bleeding rate after continuous prophylactic treatment was 0 episode/year and was 2 episodes/year for episodic treatment. After 1 year of follow-up, patients who received continuous prophylactic treatment showed a statistically significant reduction in annual bleeding rates (–p value < 0.002). The main barrier to treatment in patients was the fear of needles by questionnaire.

Conclusion: The annual bleeding rate after continuous prophylaxis treatment decreased significantly compared to episodic treatment. Additionally, after 1 year follow up of continuous prophylaxis treatment, the annual bleeding rate decreased significantly. The most common barrier to treatment in patients was the fear of needles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chuansamrit A, Isarangkura P, Hathirat P, Chiewsilp P, Kittikol J. Care of Thai hemophilia patients from 1969 to 1991. J Med Assoc Thai. 1993;76:S92-102.

Kulkarni R, Lusher J. Perinatal management of neonates with haemophilia. Br J Haematol. 2001;112:264-74.

ดารินทร์ ซอโสตถิกุล. การรักษาโรคฮีโมฟีเลีย.ใน: ปัญญา เสกสรรค์, สามารถ ภคกษมา, กมล เผือกเพ็ช, ปิติ เตชะวิจิตร์ บรรณาธิการ. 3rd Intensive Review in Pediatric: Hematology-oncology; 7-8 กันยายน 2561; โรงแรมอโนมา แกรนด์ กรุงเทพ. กรุงเทพฯ: อักษรการพิมพ์; 2561. หน้า 119-24.

อำไพวรรณ จวนสัมฤทธิ์. ทิศทางโรคฮีโมฟีเลียในปรเทศไทย. วารสารโลหิตวิทยาและเวชศาสตร์บริการโลหิต. 2564;30:103-9.

Oldenburg J, Yan S, Maro G, Krishnarajah G, Tiede A. Assessing bleeding rates, related clinical impact and factor utilization in German hemophilia B patients treated with extended half-life rIX-FP compared to prior drug therapy. J Current Med Res Opinion. 2020;36:9-15.

Reding MT, Pabinger I, Lalezari S, Santagostino E, Mancuso ME. Target joint resolution in patients with haemophilia A receiving long-term prophylaxis with BAY 94-9027. Haemophilia. 2020;26:201–4.

Ali RM, Abid M, Zafar S, Ali MS, Nadeem R, Ahmed R, et al. Management of severe hemophilia A: Low-dose prophylaxis vs on-demand treatment. Cureus. 2023;15:e41410.

Chozie NA, Primacakti F, Gatot D, Setiabudhy RD, Tulaar AB, Prasetyo M. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 12-month low-dose factor VIII tertiary prophylaxis vs on-demand treatment in severe hemophilia A children. Haemophilia. 2019;25:633-9.

Karimi M, Eshghi P, Safarpour MM, Haghpanah S, Meshksar A, Zahedi Z, et al. Modified primary prophylaxis in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A in Iran. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018;40:188-91.

Keipert C, Müller-Olling M, Gauly F, Arras-Reiter C, Hilger A. Annual bleeding rate: Pitfalls of clinical trial outcomes in hemophilia patients. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13:1127-36.

ยิ่งยง ชินธรรมมิตร์. โรคฮีโมฟีเลีย. โลหิตวิทยาและเวชศาสตร์บริการโลหิต 2565;32:191-2.

Liu Z, Feng J, Fang Y, Cheng Y, Li S. Barriers to prophylaxis treatment among hemophilia a patients and caregivers in Shandong Province. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023;18:226-36.

Zhou Z, Riske B, Forsberg AD, Ullman M, Baker JR, Koerper MA, et al. Self-reported barrier to hemophilia care in people with factor VIII deficiency. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41:S346-53.

Saxena K. Barriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia. J Blood Med. 2013;4:49–56.

Batt K, Schultz BG, Caicedo J, Hollenbeak CS, Agrawal N, Chatterjee S, et al. A real-world study comparing pre-post billed annualized bleed rates and total cost of care among non-inhibitor patients with hemophilia a switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab. J Current Med Res Opinion. 2022;38:1685–93.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Khotprada, J. . (2026). Treatment outcomes of clotting factor concentrates in patients with hemophilia. Thai Journal of Pediatrics, 65(1), 121–135. retrieved from https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJP/article/view/3912

Issue

Section

Original Articles