The Coordinated Pap Smear Screening Program Worked with Knowledge Management
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluated the outcome of the Coordinated Pap Smear Screening (CO-PAPS) Program worked with knowledge management carried out in 25 primary care units from Oct, 2005 to Sept, 2009. Materials & Method: An action research was divided into 4 main steps: 1) Formulating the CO-PAPS with knowledge management program 2) Implementing the program to the 25 PCUs by modifying the program to be appropriate for each PCU-Contact. 3) Empowering community participation and setting up anti-cancer club in community 4) Setting up the common goals between anti-cancer club and the knowledge exchange group movement. The progress of screening program was collected and examined periodically. Descriptive statistics were used. Result: After the implement action of CO-PAPS Program among the subjects who were 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 years old and 13 active anti-cancer clubs were established, the screening coverage rates were up to 80.6% in 2006, 86.1% in 2007, 82.1% in 2008, and 63.5 % in 2009. The last figure was decreased due to error in PAP-register program. The prevalences of the precancerous lesion, the carcinoma in situ and the early invasive lesion were 0.17, 0.05 and 0.01 % respectively and 100 percent of them were successively referred and treated. Conclusion: CO-PAPS program with knowledge management increased the coverage rate of screening of cervical cancer in community.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Deerasamee S, Martin N, Sontipong S, Sriamporn S, Vatanasapt V, Parkin DM, et al. Cancer in Thailand. Vol. II 1992-1994. Lyon: IARC Technical Report no. 34; 1998. p.134-5.
Vatanasapt V, Martin N, Sriplung H, Chindavijak K, Sontipong S, Sriamporn S, et al. Cancer in Thailand 1988-1991. Lyon: IARC; 1993. p.88-9.
Sriplung H, Sontipong S, Martin N, Wiangnon S, Vootipux L, editors. Cancer in Thailand. Vol. III 1995-1997. Bangkok: National Cancer Institute; 2003. p.9-18.
Vatanasapt V, Sriamporn S, Vatanasapt P. Cancer control in Thailand. Jpn J Oncol 2002; 32 (suppl 1): S82-S91.
Sriamporn S, Swaminathan R, Parkin DM, Kamsa-ard S, Hakama M. Loss-adjusted survival of cervix cancer inKhon Kaen, northeast Thailand. Br J Cancer 2004; 91: 106-10.
Boonmongkon P, Nichter M, Pylypa J, Sanhajariya N, Saitong S. Women’s health in northeast Thailand: working at the interface between the local and the global. Women Health 2002; 35: 59-80.
Kritpetcharat O, Suwanrungruang K, Sriamporn S, Kamsa-Ard S, Kritpetcharat P, Pengsaa P. The coverage of cervical cancer screening in Khon Kaen, northeast Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2003; 4: 103-5.
วิโรจน์ วรรณภิระ, สุนันทา ภักดีอำนาจ, นิพัธ กิตติมานนท์, ปฏิพิมพ์ อยู่คง, พัลลภ พงษ์สุทธิรักษ, สุชาติพรเจริญพงศ์, กิตติยา วิจิตรพฤกษ์. การควบคุมและควบคุมมะเร็งปากมดลูกโดยระบบคัดกรองแบบเชื่อมประสาน: พุทธชินราชเวชสาร 2549; 23: 164-75.
สุพัตรา ศรีวณิชชากร. บริการสุขภาพ ใกล้ใจ-ใกล้บ้าน. นนทบุรี: สำนักงาน โครงการปฏิรูประบบบริการสาธารณสุข; 2545.
Raffle AE, Quinn PAM, Babb PJ, Brett MT. Outcome of screening to prevent cancer. Analysis of cumulative incidence of cervical abnormality and modeling of cases and death prevented. BMJ 2003; 326: 901.
Raffle AE. Cervical screening: Recent changes in policy regarding age and frequency are a poor use of resources. BMJ 2004; 328: 1272-3.
Mandelblatt J, Traxler M, Lakin P, Thomas L, Chauhan P, Matseoane S, et al. A nurse practitioner intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for poor, elderly black women. The Harlem Study Team. J Gen Intern Med 1993; 8: 173-8.
สถาบันมะเร็งแห่งชาติ. แผนการดำเนินการป้องกันและควบคุมโรคมะเร็งปากมดลูกที่เหมาะสมในประเทศ.
กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันมะเร็งแห่งชาติ; 2543.
Thommasen H, Lenci P, Brake I, Anderson G. Cervical cancer screening performed by a nurse. Evaluation in family practice. Can Fam Physician 1996; 42: 2179-83.
swaddiwudhipong W, Chaovakiratipong C, Nguntra P, Mahasakpan P, Tatip Y, Boonmak C. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28: 35-9.
Bushley AW, Cassel K, Hernandez BY, Robinett H, Goodman MT. Tailored multi-media campaign to promote the human papillomavirus cohort study to young women. Prev Med 2005; 41: 98-101.
Brenna SM, Hardy E, Zeferino LC, Namura I. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to the Pap smear among women with cervical cancer. Cad Saude Publica 2001; 17: 909-14.
Lamadrid A S. Knowledge and fears among Chilean women with regard to the Papanicolaou test. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 1996; 30: 354-61.
Conway K. Attitudes to Papanicolaou smears. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 17: 189-94.
Sriamporn S, Kritpetcharat O, Nieminen P, Suwanrungraung K, Kamsa-ard S, Parkin DM. Consistency of cytology diagnosis for cervical cancer between two laboratories. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2005; 6: 208-12.
จตุพล ศรีสมบูรณ์. มะเร็งปากมดลูกภาย ในเยื่อบุ. ใน: จตุพล ศรีสมบูรณ์, บรรณาธิการ. มะเร็งวิทยา นรีเวช. กรุงเทพฯ: พี.บ.ี ฟอเรนบุค๊ เซนเตอร์; 2540. หน้า 78-9.
Mayor S. NHS cervical screening programme to introduce liquid based cytology. BMJ 2003; 327: 948.
Bentz JS. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2005; 5: 857-71.
Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RTCOG) and the JHPIEGO Corporation Cervical Cancer Group. Safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a singlevisit approach to cervical-cancer prevention in rural Thailand: a demonstration project. Lancet 2003; 361: 814-20.
Bomfim-Hyppolito S, Santana F E, Gomes de Matos M F R, Matos de Albuquerque C, Nunes GC. Cervicography as an adjunctive test to visual inspection with acetic acid in cervical cancer detection screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 92: 58-63.
Dresang LT. Colposcopy: an evidence-based update. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005; 18: 383-92.
Denny LA, Wright TC Jr. Human papillomavirus testing and screening. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 19: 501-15.
Swaddiwudhipong W, Chaovakiratipong C, Nguntra P, Mahasakpan P, Lerdlukanavonge P, Koonchote S. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24: 493-8.
Vivilaki V, Romanidou A, Theodorakis P, Lionis C. Are health education meetings effective in recruiting women in cervical screening programmes? An innovative and inexpensive intervention from the island of Crete. Rural Remote Health 2005; 5: 376.
Agurto I, Arrossi S, White S, Coffey P, Dzuba I, Bingham A, et al. Involving the community in cervical cancer prevention programs. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 89: S38-S45.
Suba EJ. Crossing the quality chasm: a requirement for successful cervical cancer prevention in developing countries. Clin Lab Med 2004; 24: 945-63.
Black ME, Yamada J, Mann V. A systematic literature eview of the effectiveness of community-based strategies to increase cervical cancer screening. Can J Public Health 2002; 93: 386-93.
Pannarunothai S. Cancer care in Thailand and future scenario for Naresuan university. Proceeding of the 11th International Charles Heidelberger Symposium on Cancer Research; 2006 January 26-29; Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 27-43.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Screening for cervical cancer. [cited 2006 July 1]. Available from: URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspscerv.htm
ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Management of abnormal cervical cytology and histology. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 3: 645-55.