Efficacy of respiratory cytology in the diagnosis of lung lesion

Main Article Content

Wanwisa Junmuenwai

Abstract

          All 324 cases were investigated for the lung lesion between January 2015 and December 2016 in Department of Anatomical Pathology of Maharat Nakorn Ratchasima Hospital, under the fiberoptic flexible bronchoscopy for collecting the samples of bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial washing for cytology as well as simultaneous bronchial biopsy for histology. All samples were taken and processed under standard procedures of cytology and histology. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic efficacy of Bronchial wash and Bronchoalveolar lavage cytology, compared with the bronchial biopsy as the gold standard diagnostic test.  There were 204 samples of Bronchial wash cytology (63%) and 120 of Bronchoalveolar lavage (37%). The bronchial wash cytology showed the sensitivity 39.4%, specificity 98.1% and accuracy 69.6%. The Bronchoalveolar lavage cytology showed the sensitivity 36.2%, specificity 95.9% and accuracy 72.5%.  In the patients with malignant histopathology, the most common age group was between 61 and 70 years of age, male to female ratio was 1.8: 1 and the right lung was predominantly found (56.9%). The common presenting symptoms were cough (66.4%) and dyspnea (39.8%). The most common type of tumor was adenocarcinoma (62.1%). Smoking was found in 64.3 % of malignancy group. It was concluded that bronchial wash cytology and Bronchoalveolar lavage cytology were a safe, rapid and cost-effective tool for the diagnosis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Junmuenwai, W. (2024). Efficacy of respiratory cytology in the diagnosis of lung lesion. Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital Journal, 40(1), 7–14. Retrieved from https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MNRHJ/article/view/1371
Section
Original Article

References

Brambilla E, Travis WD. Lung cancer. In: Stewart BW, Wild CP (eds) World Cancer Report. World Health Organization, Lyon, 2014; 489-508.

Imsamran W, Chaiwerawattana A, Wiangnon S, et al. Cancer in Thailand. Bangkok Cancer Registry Unit, National Cancer Institute Thailand; 2015.

Prakash UB. Bronchoscopic specimen collection: Is there a proper order of sequence? Journal of Broncho-logy 2002; 9(4): 269.

M. Ahmad, S. Afzal, W. Saeed, A. Mubarik, N. Saleem, S. A. Khan, S. Rafi. Efficacy of Bronchial Wash Cytology and its correlation with Biopsy in Lung Tumours. J Pak Med Assoc 2004; 56(1): 13-16.

Monisha Choudhury, Smita Singh, Savita Agarwal. Efficacy of Bronchial Brush Cytology and Bronchial Washings in Diagnosis of Non Neoplastic and Neoplastic Bronchopulmonary Lesions. Turkish Journal of Pathology 2012, 28: 142-146.

Shalinee Rao, Shivani Rao, Archana Lal, Thangaswamy Dhanasekar. Bronchial wash cytology: A study on morphology and morphometry. J Cytol. 2014 Apr-Jun; 31(2): 63-67.

D Raiza, Sudhasmita Rout, K Prasada Reddy, PVB Ramalaxmi, BK Prithvi, K Subramanyam Harikishan. Efficacy of Bronchial Wash and Brush Cytology and its correlation with Biopsy in Lung Lesions. International Journal Of Heath Reserch In Modern Integrated Medical Science 2014: 21 -24.

Shagufta Tahir Mufti, Ghadeer A. Mokhtar. Diagnostic value of bronchial wash, bronchial brushing, fine needle aspiration cytology versus combined bronchial wash and bronchial brushing in the diagnosis of primary lung carcinomas at a tertiary care hospital. Biomedical Research 2015; 26 (4): 777-784.

DS Gaur, NC Thapliyal, S kishore, VP pathak. Efficacy of broncho-alveolar lavage and bronchial brush cytology in diagnosing lung cancers. J ournal of cytology. 2007; 24: 73-77.

Nazia Bhat, Mir Junaid Nazeir, Humaira Bashir, Nusrat Bashir, Summiya Farooq, Kaneez Fatima, Khalil M. Baba. Correlation of bronchial biopsy with broncho-alveolar lavage in lung malignancies. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016 Feb; 4(2): 428-435.

Vijeta Tomar, N Vijay, P Nuwal, R Dixit. Comparative study of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, and FNAC in diagnosing malignant neoplasms of lungs. Journal of Cytology 2016; 33: 210-3.

Thivolet-Bejui F. Cytopathological pitfalls in bronchopulmonary tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17: 412-416.

Wongsurakiat P, Wongbunnate S, Dejsomritrutai W, Charoenratanakul S, Tscheikuna J, Youngchaiyud P, et al. Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage and post bronchoscopic sputum cytology in peripheral lung cancer. Respirology. 1998; 3(2): 131-7.

Spjut HJ, Fier DJ, Ackerman LV. Exfolivative cytology and pulmonary cancer: a histopathologic and cytologic correlation. J Thoracic Surg 1995; 30: 90-7.

Shopland DR, Eyre HJ, Pechacek TF. Smoking -attributable cancer mortality in 1991: is lung cancer now the leading cause of death among smokers in the United States? J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83: 1142-8.

A. Smita Reddy, N. Vivekanand, K. Durga. Efficacy of Bronchial Wash and Brush Cytology in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancers. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences. 2014; 2(2D): 816-820.

Travis WD, Travis L, Devesa SS. Lung Cancer. 1995; 75: 191-202.

Wahbah M, Boroumand N, Castro C, El-Zeky F, Eltorky M. Changing trends in the distribution of the histologic types of lung cancer. A review of 4, 439 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007; 11: 89.

Minna JD. Neoplasms of the lung. In : Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL eds. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 15th ed. New York: McGraw Hill company; 2001: pp562- 71.

Tamboli P & Ro. J. Y: Pathologic evaluation of lung cancer. Lung Cancer. M.D. Anderson cancer cares series; M.D. Anderson cancer center, Texas, 2003.