Predictive Value of a Rapid Immunometric NycoCard D-dimer Assay for Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The reported diagnostic performance of D-dimer assay for excluding pulmonary embolism (PE) vary widely. This study was carried out to assess the diagnostic performance of NycoCard D-dimer assay in suspected PE patients. Objective: To determine if a D-dimer assay can reliably exclude PE in patients with suspected PE. Methods: The patients evaluated for PE with a CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and D-dimer assay were eligible for inclusion. The electronic medical records of the patients were reviewed to analyze the diagnostic performance of NycoCard D-dimer assay for excluding acute PE. Collected data included the presence or absence of PE, D-dimer result and patient demographics. Results: A total of 229 consecutive patients underwent CTPA for acute PE and had a D-dimer measurement performed. Pulmonary embolisms were reported for 86/229 (37%) CTPAs. Overall, the D-dimer assay was found to have a sensitivity and specificity of 96.5% and 29.4%, respectively, for the diagnosis of PE, with a positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 45.1% and 93.3%, respectively. The negative predictive value in low or moderate clinical probability of PE is 95.5% (95% CI, 84.5% to 99.4%). The likelihood ratio associated with a negative D-dimer test result was 0.09 (CI, 0.02-0.38) Conclusions: A normal NycoCard D-dimer test result is useful in excluding PE when the clinical probability of the presence of PE is low or intermediate. An understanding of the physiological basis and limitations of D-dimer value may contribute to reduce its inappropriate use.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Authors/Task Force Members. S. Konstantinides, A. Torbicki, G. Agnelli, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur. Heart J. 35(2014)3033-3069.
Heit JA, Minor TA, Andrews JC, Larson DR, Li H, Nichols WL. Determinants of plasma fibrin D-dimer sensitivity for acute pulmonary embolism as defined by pulmonary angiography. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999; 123:235-40.
Hein-Rasmussen R, Tuxen CD, Wiinberg N. Diagnostic value of the Nycocard, Nycomed d-dimer assay for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study. Thromb Res 2000; 100:287-92.
Snow V, Qaseem A, Barry P, Hornbake ER, et al. The Joint American College Of Physicians/American Academy Of Family Physicians Panel On Deep Venous Thrombosis/pulmonary Embolism Management of Venous Thromboembolism: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jan; 5(1):74-80.
Di Nisio M, Squizzato A, Rutjes AW, Buller HR, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM. Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer test for exclusion of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5(2):296-304.
Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, Olson RE, Ghali WA, Brant R, Biel RK, Bharadia V,Kalra NK. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venousthrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140(8): 589-602.
Gogstad GO, Dale S, Brosstad F, Brandsne s& Oslash, Holtlund J, Mørk E, Gaertner E, Borch SM. Assay of D-dimer based on immunofiltration and staining with gold colloids. Clin Chem 1993; 39(10):2070-6.
Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, Olson RE, Ghali WA, Brant R, Biel RK, Bharadia V, Kalra NK . D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140 (8):589-592.
Kearon C. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, Can Med Assoc 2003: 168(2):183-194.
Kraaijenhagen RA, Wallis J, Koopman MM, de Groot MR, Piovella F, Prandoni P, Büller HR.Can causes of false-normal D-dimer test [SimpliRED] results be identified? Thromb Res. 2003; 111(3):155-8.
Miron MJ, Perrier A, Bounameaux H, et al. Contribution of noninvasive evaluation to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients. Eur Respir J. 1999; 13:1365-1370.
Mitchell AM, Kline JA. Contrast nephropathy following computed tomography angiography of the chest for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5:50-4.
Le Gal G, Bounameaux H. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: running after the decreasing prevalence of cases among suspected patients. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1244-6.
Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, Richman PB, Courtney DM. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2:1247-55.
Hugli O, Righini M, Le Gal G, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Verschuren F, Meyer G, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D The pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) rule does not safely exclude pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2011; 9(2): 300.
Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL, Roy P, Verschuren F, Ghuysen A, et al. Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism. JAMA. 2014; 311(11): 1117.