Current Status of Dyslipidemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Its Associated Factors, its Association with Vascular Complications and Patterns of Lipid Lowering Therapy in Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital

Main Article Content

Pinij Kaewsuwanna
Thanya Chetthakul

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the major cause of death in diabetic patient. In order to decrease CVD, management of dyslipidemia is very important. American diabetes association (ADA) recommended that plasma LDL cholesterol should be <100 mg/dL. Currently (2005), ADA recommended more aggressive LDL target. Diabetic patients with plasma cholesterol >135 mg/dL must be treated except for the patients <40 years old. Plasma cholesterol must be lower by 30-40% with LDL <100 mg/dL for primary and 70 mg/dL for secondary CVD prevention. Uderstanding about current dyslipidemia status in people with diabetes is very important milestone for CVD Prevention diabetics. Objectives: To demonstrate a current status of dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus, to demonstrate the associated factors of good lipid control, to demonstrate the association of lipid levels and the vascular complications and to demonstrate the patterns of lipid lowering therapy in Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima hospital. Material and Methods: One thousand type 2 diabetic patients who attended at least one year at diabetic clinics in Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima hospital from April to December 2003 were recruited. Individual demographic data including education, socioeconomic status, diabetic complications and plasma lipid concentration and other metabolic parameters within six months were recorded based on the ADA guideline. Results: There were 1,000 type 2 diabetes (Age 59.4±6.8 years, M:F 27.3%:72.7%) from1,066 diabetic patients. In this group, mean fasting plasma glucose was 151.9±54.2 mg/dL while HbA1c was 7.9±2.1 mg/dL. Seventy-five percent had hypertension, 6.1% had a history of coronary artery disease and 3.6% had a history of cerebrovascular disease. Plasma lipid profiles were mean total cholesterol of 203.8±47.2 mg/dL, mean LEL-C of 115.2±38.7 mg/dL, mean triglyceride of 164.7±106.7 mg/dL and mean HDL-C of 55.9±16.0 mg/dL. Only 34.4% took lipid lowering agents, 27.3% with statin only, 5.9% with fibrate only and 1.4% with a combination. More than half of diabetic patients (65.6%) did not take lipid lowering agents, even ones who had LDL-C>100 mg/dL. Conclusion: Elevated LDL cholesterol was the most importand dyslipidemia in diabetes. But only about 35% took lipid-lowering agents. The association between vascular complication and level of lipid control was demonstrated however correlation between cardiovascular disease and lipid level control was not identified.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kaewsuwanna, P., & Chetthakul, T. (2024). Current Status of Dyslipidemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Its Associated Factors, its Association with Vascular Complications and Patterns of Lipid Lowering Therapy in Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital. Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital Journal, 30(1), 35–48. Retrieved from https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MNRHJ/article/view/2012
Section
Original Article

References

Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart discasc in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:229-34.

Pyorala K, Pedersen TR, Kjekshus J, Faergeman O, Olsson AG, Thoergersson G. Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Diabetes Care 1997;20:614-20.

Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Pancl on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel IIII). JAMA 2001; 285:2486-97.

Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebocontrolled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 2005-16.

Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, Neil HA, Livingstone SJ, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:685-96.

Cannon CP, Braumwald E, McCabe CH, Rader DJ, Roulcau JL, Belder R, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1495-504.

de Lemos JA, Blazing MA, Wiviott SD, Lewis EF, Fox KA, White HD, et al. Early intensive vs a delayed conser- vative simvastatin strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes: phase Z of the A to Z trial. JAMA 2004; 292: 1307-16.

Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Brown BG,Ganz P, Vogel RA, etal. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:1071-80.

American Diabetes Association. Position Statement: Standard of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: S4-S36.

Report of the expert committce on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 26: S5-S20.

Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh

CD, Davis M, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1675-6.