The Relationship Between the Height of the Uterus and Pregnancy in Normal Pregnant Women at Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
A prospective study was undertaken in 993 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital to assess the correlation of symphysis-fundal height and gestational age. A total of 1221 symphysis-fundal height measurements were arranged on the basis of 10th, 50th and 90th percentile. The symphysis-fundal height was well correlated with the gestational age by the correlation coefficient (r=0.98) and the correlation of determination (r2=0.96) the type of correlation was positive curvilinear relation and was best fit to the exponential equation of In (y) = 2.3601435 + 0.0375715x as well the parabola equation of
y = 10.6216769 + 0.3202591x + 0.01400374x2
(where x = gestaional age, and y = symphysis-fundal height)
During the 17th and 36th week of gestation, the correlation of symphysis-fundal height and gestational age was well correlated in linear relationship and was fit to the equation
y = 2.6698488 + 1.0198841x
During these weeks, the increment of symphysis-fundal height was 1 cm. weekly and the gestational age can be simply calculated by adding 3 to the symphysis-fundal height measured. This is a simple, reliable and inexpensive method, eventhough it is not a precise diagnostic tool but it does provide an improvement on abdominal palpation in the prediction of abnormal fetal growth. An attempt to develop a normogram of symphysis-fundal height for our population was made.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
วราวุธ สุมาวงศ์, คู่มือการฝากครรภ์และการคลอด, คณะแพทย์ศาสตร์โรงพยาบาลรามาธิบดี, พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 14, ปี พ.ศ.2533 หน้า 4-21
Engstrom JL. Measurement of fundal height. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs.1988;17(3):172-8
Faustin D, Gutierrez L, Gintautal J, et al. Clinical assessment of gestational age :a comparison of two methods. J Nat! Med Assoc.1991;83(5):425-9
Grover V, Usha R, Kalra S, et al. Altered fetal growth : antenatal diagnosis by symphysis fundal height in India and comparison with western charts.Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991;35(3):23-4
Indira R, Oumachigui A, Narayan KA, et al.Symphysis-fundal height measurement, a reliable parameter for assessment of fetal growth. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1990;(1):1-5
Cunningham FG, Mc Donald PC,Gant NF, et al. Williams Obstetrics 19th Ed. Connecticut, USA. Appleton & Lange.1993;251,853,879
Mc Donald E. Measuration of the child in the uterus with new methods. JAMA 1906;47:1979
Ogunranti JO. Fundal height in normal pregnant Nigerian women : anthropmetric gravidiogram. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990;33(4):299-305
Greenhill JP, Friedman EA. Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics. 13" ed Philadelphia : WB Saunders, 1974;132
Lockwood CJ, Weiner S. Assessment of fetal growth. Clin Perinatol. 1986;13(1):3-35
Westin B. Gravidogram and fetal growth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977;56:273.
Belizan IM, Villar J, Nardin JC, et al. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method : Measurement of uterine height. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;131:643
Quaranta P, Currel R, Redman CWG, Prediction of small for dates infants by measurement of symphyseal-fundal-height. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1981;88:115
Walin A, Gyllensward A, Westin B. Symphyseal fundus measurment in prediction of fetal growth disturbance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981;60:317-323
Andersen HF, Johnson TRB, Folra JD, et al. Gestational age assessment. Il. Prediction from combined clinical observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;140:770
Engstrom JL, Mcfarin BL, Sampson MB. Fundal height measurement. Part 4 Accuracy of clinicians' identification of the uterine fundus during pregnancy. J Nurse Midwifery 1993;38(6):318-23
Engstrom JL, Sittler CP. Fundal height measurement. Part 1 Techniques for measuring fundal height. J Nurse Midwifery 1993;38(1):5-16