Imprint Cytology and Frozen Section in The Diagnosis of Breast Lesions การตรวจเซลล์โดยวิธีตัดแปะและวิธีการตรวจชิ้นเนื้อแช่แข็ง ในการวินิจฉัยรอยโรคของเต้านม
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Frozen section has been accented as a high reliable procedure for intraoperative diagnosis. The accuracy varies with the type of tissue and experienced pathologists. Recently, the utlity of intraoperative imprint cytology becomes widely used because of its simplicity, rapidity and economy. Its accuracy is high, comparable to frozen section. The Department of Anatomical Pathology, Saraburi hospital has employed the two techniques on breast tissue submitted for intraoperative diagnosis. Objective: To compare the accuracy of frozen section and imprint cytology with permanent section for diagnosis of breast lesion. Materials and methods: From Apil 1997 to August 2003, one hundred and twenty three breast specimens submitted to department of Anatomical pathogy, Saraburi Hospital for intraoperative diagnoses were included into the study. All specimens, imprint and frozen section were carried out and the results were compared with the permanent sections. Those finding were used to find out accuracy, sensitivity, specity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of frozen section and imprint cytology. Results: Imprint cytology, as compared to permanent section, had 94.9% accuracy, 94.1% sensitivity, 96.9% specificity , 98.7% positive predictive value and 91.4% negative predictive value, while respective corresponding data for frozen section were 96.5%, 95.5%, 100%, 100%, and 91.8%. When intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section were used together, it yielded 98.4% accuracy, 97.8% senstivity and 100% specificity. Conclusion: Both the frozen section technique and imprint cytology showed high accuracy rates. The imprint cytology conjunction with frozen section examination are ensuring accuracy in rapid tissue diagnosis of breast with more rapidity and more simplicity.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bianchi S, Palli D, Ciatto S, Galli M, Giorgi D, Vezzosi V, et al. Accuracy and reliability of frozen section diagnosis in a series of 672 nonpalpable breast lesion. Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103: 199-205.
Ackerman LV, Ramirez GA. The indications for and limitations of frozen section diagnosis: A review of 1,269 consecutive frozen sections. Br J Surg 1959; 46: 336-50.
Nazakawa H, Rosen P, Lane N, Lattes R. Frozen section experience in 3000 cases: Accuracy, limitations, and value in residency training. Am J Clin Pathol 1968: 49: 41-51.
Holaday WJ, Assor D. Ten thousand consecutive frozen sections: A retrospective study focusing on accuracy and quality control. Am J Clin Pathol 1974; 61: 769-71.
Rosen P. Frozen section diagnosis of beast lesions: Recent experience with 556 consecutive biopsies. Ann Surg 1978; 187: 17-9.
Kaufman Z, Lew S, Griffel B, Dinbar A. Frozen section diagnosis in surgical pathology. Cancer 1986;57:377-9.
Sparkman RS. Reliability of frozen section in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Ann Surg 1962; 155: 924-34.
Oneson RH, Minke JA, Silverberg SG. Intraoperative pathologic consultation: An audit of I,000 recent consecutive cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13: 237-43.
Dahlin DC. Seventy-five years experience with frozen section at Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clinic Proc 1980; 55: 721-3.
Scucchi LF, Di Stefano D, Cosentino L, Vecchione A. Value of cytology as an adjunctive intraoperative diagnostic method. Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 1489-96.
Blaustein PA, Silverberg SG. Rapid cytologic examination of surgical specimens. Pathol Annu 1977; 12:251-78.
Suen K, Wood W, Syed A, Quenville N, Clement P. Role of imprint cytology in intraoperative diagnosis: Value and limitations. J Clin Pathol 1978; 31: 328-37.
Marvec P. Cytologic diagnosis from tumor tissue using the "Quick method" during operation. Acta Cytol. 1967; 11: 229-30.
Owings RM. Rapid cytologic examination of surgical specimens: A valuable technique in the surgical pathology laboratory. Hum Pathol 1984; 15: 605-14.
Tribe CR: Cytological diagnosis of breast tumors by the imprint method. J Clin Pathol 1965;18:31-9.
Tokai C, Szombathelyi L. Intraoperative cytodiagnosis. Acta Cytol 1969; 13: 2-3.
Yoshi Y, Takhashi J, Yamaoka Y,Kasugai T. Significance of imprint smear in cytologic diagnosis of malignant tumor of the stomach. Acta Cytol 1970; 14: 249-53.
Aust R, Stahle I,Stenkvist B. The imprint method for the cytodiagnosis of lymphadenopathies and tumors of the head and neck. Acta Cytol 1971; 15: 123-7.
Kontozoglou TE, Cramer HM. The advantages of intraoperative cytology. Analysis of 215 smears and review of the literature. Acta Cytol 1991; 35: 154-64.
Lee TK. The value of imprint cylogy in tumor diagnosis: a retrospective study of 522 cases in Northern China. Acta Cytol 1982; 26: 169-71.
Pilar P, Ruberstone A. A correlation of breast imprints (stained by the method of Papanicolaou) and the tissue sections. Acta Cytol 1968; 12: 462-72.
Webb AJ. The diagnostic cytology of breast carcinoma. Br J Surg 1970; 57: 259-64.
Tribe CR. A comparison of rapid methods including imprint cytodiagnosis for the diagnosis of breast tumors. J Clin Pathol 1973; 26: 273-7.
Veneti S, Mouzaka LT, Toufexi H. Xenitides J, Anastasiadis P. Imprint cytology: A rapid, reliable method of diagnosing breast malignancy. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 649-52.
Sakai Y, Lauslahti K. Comparison and analysis of the results of cytodiagnosis and frozen section during operation. Acta Cytol 1969; 13: 359-68.
Helpap B, Tschubel K. The significance of imprint cytology in breast biopsy diagnosis. Acta Cytol 1978;22: 133-7.
Dutta SK, Chattopadhyaya A, Roy S. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration and imprint cytology in the early diagnosis of breast lesions with histopathological correlation. J Indian Med Assoc. 2001; 99: 421-3.
Koshi S, Goligher J, Gottlieb M, Bradley G, Khan M. Reyes R, et al. The accuracy ofimprint cytology of breast core biopsy under ultrasound guidance. Breast Cancer Res 2002; 4(Suppl 1): 14.
Shabaik RH, Cox C, Clark R, Reintgen D, Humphrey E, Nicosia S. Imprint cytology of needlelocalized breast lesion. Acta Cytol 1993; 37: 10-5.
Scopa CD, Melachrinou M, Apessou D, Bonikos D. Tissue imprints in surgical pathology: a rapid intraoperative diagnostic aid. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 6: 5-8.
Champakam NS, D'Souza V, Kamat JR, Parashar SK. Imprint cytology in the diagnosis of breast tumor. Int Surg 1982; 67(4 Suppl): 425-6.
Chonmaitri IS. Imprint cytologic examination as an adjunct to frozen section. J Med Assoc Thai 1993; 76:458-64.