Water supply management of local government organizations for accessibility clean water in Thailand

Authors

  • Parichart Soisoongnern Bureau of Food and Water Sanitation
  • Ratchaphadung Damrongpingkasakul
  • Aim-on khanmee
  • Darunee Sesudto

Keywords:

Local Water Supply, Water Quality, Water Literacy

Abstract

This study aimed to: 1) examine local water supply management and public water literacy, 2) evaluate water quality at system entry and point-of-use, and 3) synthesize policy recommendations to enhance local water supply management. A mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected via surveys from 100 Environmental Health Accreditation (EHA) applicant local administrative organizations (LAOs) and face-to-face interviews with 420 local residents. Qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions across 18 purposively selected study sites spanning 6 regions, combined with water quality analysis of 21 parameters (36 samples) against Department of Health 2020 Drinking Water Standards.

The results showed that 86.00% of LAOs managed their own water production, primarily utilizing surface water (47.00%). Average monthly revenue and expenditure were 284,971.12 THB and 232,865.94 THB, respectively. However, a major limitation was identified: only 34.70% possessed water quality monitoring tools or systems. Although most residents exhibited moderate-to-high water literacy (85.24%–96.90%), operational issues persisted, notably chlorine odor (35.48%) and turbidity (14.29%), incurring an average bottled water expense of 296.82 THB/household/month. Only 33.33% of water systems met all standard parameters. Microbiological risks were prominent, with Coliform bacteria (27.78%) and E. coli (11.11%) failing standards at both entry and end-points.

The results showed that 86.00% of LAOs managed their own water production, primarily utilizing surface water (47.00%). Average monthly revenue and expenditure were 284,971.12 THB and 232,865.94 THB, respectively. However, a major limitation was identified: only 34.70% possessed water quality monitoring tools or systems. Although most residents exhibited moderate-to-high water literacy (85.24%–96.90%), operational issues persisted, notably chlorine odor (35.48%) and turbidity (14.29%), incurring an average bottled water expense of 296.82 THB/household/month. Only 33.33% of water systems met all standard parameters. Microbiological risks were prominent, with Coliform bacteria (27.78%) and E. coli (11.11%) failing standards at both entry and end-points.

References

กรมอนามัย กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. (2563). เกณฑ์มาตรฐานคุณภาพน้ำประปาดื่มได้ กรมอนามัย พ.ศ. 2563. โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย.

กรมส่งเสริมการปกครองท้องถิ่น. (2565). คู่มือหลักเกณฑ์และมาตรฐานคุณภาพระบบประปาหมู่บ้านขององค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่น. กรมส่งเสริมการปกครองท้องถิ่น.

มูลนิธิส่งเสริมเทคโนโลยี (ไทย-ญี่ปุ่น). (2532). คู่มือการปรับปรุงคุณภาพน้ำและการควบคุมระบบผลิตน้ำประปา. มูลนิธิส่งเสริมเทคโนโลยี (ไทย-ญี่ปุ่น).

ยิมรัตน์ ยิ้มรัตนบวร. (2555). การประเมินคุณภาพน้ำและระบบบริหารจัดการน้ำประปาหมู่บ้านในเขตภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ. สำนักบริหารโครงการวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีสุรนารี.

ยุทธศิลป์ โยธาวุฒิ. (2560). การศึกษาสถานการณ์และรูปแบบการบริหารจัดการระบบประปาหมู่บ้านอย่างยั่งยืน. วารสารวิชาการสาธารณสุข, 26(3), 485–496.

อังศินันท์ อินทรกำแหง. (2560). ความรอบรู้ด้านสุขภาพ: การวัดและการพัฒนา. สถาบันวิจัยพฤติกรรมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ.

Bartram, J., & Ballance, R. (Eds.). (1996). Water quality monitoring: A practical guide to the design and implementation of freshwater quality studies and monitoring programmes. E & FN Spon.

Dean, A. J., Fielding, K. S., & Newton, F. J. (2016). Community knowledge about water: Who has better knowledge and is this associated with water-related behaviors and support for water-related policies? PLOS ONE, 11(7), e0159063. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159063

Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259

Otaki, Y., Sakura, O., & Otaki, M. (2015). Advocating water literacy. Mahasarakham International Journal of Engineering Technology, 1(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.14456/mijet.2015.8

Rahmanian, N., Ali, S. H. B., Homayoonfard, M., Ali, N. J., Rehan, M., Sadef, Y., & Nizami, A. S. (2015). Analysis of physiochemical parameters to evaluate the drinking water quality in the State of Perak, Malaysia. Journal of Chemistry, 2015, Article 716125. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/716125

Silva, G. M. e., Campos, D. F., Brasil, J. A. T., Tremblay, M., Mendiondo, E. M., & Ghiglieno, F. (2022). Advances in technological research for online and in situ water quality monitoring—A review. Sustainability, 14(9), 5059. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095059

Tian, K., Wang, H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Investigation and evaluation of water literacy of urban residents in China based on data correction method. Water Policy, 23(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2021.160

World Health Organization. (2009). Water safety plan manual: Step-by-step risk management for drinking-water suppliers. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241548151

กรอบแนวคิด 3

Downloads

Published

25-09-2026

How to Cite

Soisoongnern, P., Damrongpingkasakul, R., khanmee, A.- on, & Sesudto , D. (2026). Water supply management of local government organizations for accessibility clean water in Thailand. Journal of Health Promotion and Environmental Health Research Health Promotion Centre 8 Udon Thani, 4(3), e4746 (1–20). retrieved from https://he04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hpc8Journal/article/view/4767

Issue

Section

Research Articles