Pre stent facilitate ureteric stone free in SWL procedure in Pahonpolpayuhasena Hospiatal
Abstract
Treatment of ureteric stone was safe outpatient basis and the most common procedure familial for Urologist were SWL and DJ stent placement, However there were not compare result preureteric stent for SWL in ureter and studied result efficacy for treatment ureteric stone by SWL in Pahonpholpayuhasena hospital.
Material and methods; Retrospective 375 Ureteric stone patients were treatment with SWL as primary intervention between April 2017 to Aril 2020.StudiesPre-stent group for 28 cases and simple randomization for Non-stent group for 34 cases. Collecting data for age, gender, hometown, BMI, GFR, stone burden, location, lateralization, degree of hydronephrosis and shockwave energy and success rate by follow up by Film KUB 2-4 wks a parts. The success means, clear stone by film KUB or not more than 3 mm residual stone. Statistics were student t-test, Chi-squared and descriptive statistics. Result success rate were 71.4% (20/28) in pre-stent group and 55.9% (19/34) in non stent group (P=0.020) and overall success rate were 51.01% .ConclusionsSWL for ureteric stone was suitable for Covid-19 Era which can facilitate stone passage by ureteric stentand safe.Studies found that more than 3 session for ureteric SWL that seem no benefit for stone clearance.
References
Tosukhowong P, Yachntha C, Sasivongsbhakdi T, Boonla C, Tungsanga K. Nephrolithiasis: Pathophysiology, therapeutic approach and health promotion. Chula Med J 2006 Feb;50(2):103-23.
C. Türk (Chair), A. Neisius, C. Seitz, A. Skolarikos (Vice-chair), A. Petrik, K. Thomas et.al. EAU GUIDELINES ON UROLITHIASIS. 2020, March,289-320.
Luke F. Reynolds, Tad Kroczak, Kenneth T. Pace. Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes. Asian journal of urology 2018:vol 5:256-263.
Mohamed M. Elkholy, Hassan Ismail, Mohamed A. Abdelkhalek, Mohamad M. Badr, Mohamed M. Elfeky: .Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy using Dornier SII in different levels of ureteral stones. Urology Annals 2014: Vol 6(4):346-351.
Tommy Kjærgaard Nielsen, Jorgen Bjerggaard Jensen. Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones. BMC Urology 2017, 17:59
Shu Wang, YitianZhang,Xin Zhang, Yuzhe Tang, JianxingLi. Upper urinary tract stone compositions: the role of age and gender.IBJU2020;Vol 46(1):70-80.
A.Khalique,S.Arshad,P.Kumar,M.Hussain. Frequency of stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones in adult patients with renal insufficiency; African Journal of Urology; 2017: Vol 23: 219-223.
Hsi-Lin Hsiao, Shu-Pin Huang, Wen-Jeng Wu, Yung-Chin Lee, Wei-Ming Li, Yii-Her Chou. Impact of hydronephrosis on treatment outcome of solitary proximal ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:507–13.
M Hammad Ather, Aftab H Jafri, M Nasir Sulaiman. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography compared to unenhanced CT for stone and obstruction in patients with renal failure; BMC Medical Imaging 2004; Vol 4(2).
Athanasios N. Argyropoulos and David A. Tolley. Ureteric stents compromise stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones: results of a matched-pair analysis; BJUI 2008; Vol 103;76-80.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Phaholpolpayuhasena Hospital
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของโรงพยาบาลพหลพลพยุหเสนา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับโรงพยาบาลพหลพลพยุหเสนาและบุคลากรท่านอื่น ๆ ในโรงพยาบาลฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใด ๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเอง
Phaholpolpayuhasena Hospital